Crowd Sourced Equity Funding Almost Ready to Go

31 July 2015

 As published in CK Momentum Issue 7  (Click here to download)

The Australian startup ecosystem is in need of new sources of capital to unleash the innovation within. The current equity raising regulatory framework is simply not suited to most startups with its heavy focus on compliance and investor protections.

Crowd Sourced Equity Funding (“CSEF”) is seen as a way to free up vast sums of investment capital. With legislation likely to be introduced to parliament in the coming months, encouragingly it appears that the Opposition is willing to work in a bipartisan way with the Abbott Government to help fast track the introduction of CSEF reforms.

The allocation of $7.8 million in the budget for ASIC to implement and monitor a regulatory framework to facilitate the use of CSEF is another promising sign we are getting closer to implementation. We had hoped that the budget might give the government an opportunity to give more specific guidance around the CSEF legislation likely to be introduced to parliament but unfortunately we are still left to ponder which of the three broad alternatives will be adopted.

To recap, the three broad CSEF regulatory models being considered by the Treasury at present are:

1.  RETAIN THE EXISTING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

which highly restricts the ability of startups to attract capital.

2.  ESTABLISH A NEW CSEF FRAMEWORK:

  • a new category of public company for CSEF issuers that are exempts from certain ordinary public company compliance requirements;
  • equity raisings through CSEF will be limited to $2 million in any 12 month period;
  • individual investors can only invest $2,500 in any particular startup, and a maximum of $10,000 overall, in any 12 month period.

3.  FOLLOW THE NEW ZEALAND CSEF MODEL:

  • there are no exemptions from public company compliance requirements;
  • equity raisings through CSEF are limited to $2 million in any 12 month period;
  • no investor caps, but CSEF issuers are obliged to provide different levels of disclosure depending on whether there are no, low or high voluntary investor caps;

It is difficult to say whether the less regulated NZ model will be followed or whether the less regulated NZ model will be followed or whether investor protections will be given more emphasis.  But we are sure there are a lot of startups in need of equity hoping for a lighter regulation touch as they stand by the mantra: “let the crowd decide“.

It is hoped that the Government will introduce legislation by August 2015 an we hope that the bipartisan approach promised by the Opposition will mean our next report discusses the details of the new CSEF legislation, rather than talking about the alternatives.

This bulletin is produced as general information in summary for clients and subscribers and should not be relied upon as a substitute for detailed legal advice or as a basis for formulating business or other decisions. ClarkeKann asserts copyright over the contents of this document. This bulletin is produced by ClarkeKann. It is intended to provide general information in summary form on legal topics, current at the time of publication. The contents do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular matters. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation. Privacy Policy

Subscribe

…and we’ll email you valuable insights into issues affecting you and your business.

More Insights

Introducing Corporate Collective Investment Vehicles

Introducing Corporate Collective Investment Vehicles

Traditionally it has been perceived that a lack of familiarity by foreign investors with the trust based structure of Australian managed investment schemes has been a significant barrier to attracting offshore investment in Australian funds. To combat this, from 1...

read more
High Court lays down the law on asset-based lending

High Court lays down the law on asset-based lending

A recent case decided by the High Court found that the lender of an asset-based facility acted unconscionably in making a loan available to the borrower and ordered that the loan and mortgage be set aside. Key Takeaways Lenders must carefully scrutinize the...

read more