Bank Guarantees: What All Landlords Should Know

3 August 2015

As published in CK Momentum Issue 4  (Click here to download)

Bank guarantees are often used by tenants to provide landlords under commercial or retail leases with security about the performance of their obligations. Typically, the terms of the bank guarantee will provide for the landlord to have immediate access to the guaranteed funds without having to wait for a Court decision to confirm that the lessee has breached the lease. 

Joanne Chang, a lawyer in our Property & Projects team, provides a warning to landlords about a possible pitfall.

RECENT CHANGES TO THE LAW

A recent case casts some doubt on the proposition that landlords have immediate access to guaranteed funds: it all depends on how your lease and bank guarantee is worded.

The Court considered whether a landlord could demand payment under a bank guarantee based on a claim that the tenant had breached the lease, or whether it was only entitled to do so once it was proven the tenant had breached the lease. The Court found the bank guarantee was drafted in a way to suggest that if the tenant was not actually in breach of the lease, the landlord had no right to call on the bank guarantee. An injunction was granted to stop the landlord from calling on the bank guarantee.

The outcome is clear: landlords need to ensure that leases and bank guarantees are drafted to provide them with immediate access to the bank guarantees without having to prove that an actual breach of the lease has occurred.

WHAT SHOULD LANDLORDS DO?

As a landlord, you should ensure that:

  • your lease allows you to approve the bank guarantee, so that you can make sure it is in a form acceptable to you;
  • the lease allows you to call on the bank guarantee where you believe you have acted in good faith and consider that the tenant has breached the lease;
  • you are cautious in assessing your right to call on the bank;
  • guarantees before doing so to avoid any potential litigation; and
  • you review all current leases and bank guarantees to ensure that you are not unduly restricted from calling up under the bank guarantee. While it may be difficult to amend the terms now, you may be able to do so when the lease falls for renewal.

This bulletin is produced as general information in summary for clients and subscribers and should not be relied upon as a substitute for detailed legal advice or as a basis for formulating business or other decisions. ClarkeKann asserts copyright over the contents of this document. This bulletin is produced by ClarkeKann. It is intended to provide general information in summary form on legal topics, current at the time of publication. The contents do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular matters. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation. Privacy Policy

Subscribe

…and we’ll email you valuable insights into issues affecting you and your business.

More Insights

Release clauses in disputes settlement

Release clauses in disputes settlement

Broad and all-encompassing release clauses generally found in agreements in settlement of a dispute may be limited in its application depending on the circumstances and knowledge of the parties at the time the release came into existence. Key Takeaways When deeds of...

read more
Disputing beer brands and the Australian Consumer Law

Disputing beer brands and the Australian Consumer Law

Previously we discussed reputation in a trade mark and the law of trade mark infringement under the Trade Marks Act. Next, we consider reputation and its treatment under the Australian Consumer Law and the case between rival brewing companies Brick Lane Brewing Co Pty...

read more
Reputation in a trade mark – not relevant to infringement

Reputation in a trade mark – not relevant to infringement

Independent real estate start-up, The North Agency, fends off property monolith, The Agency, in the Federal Court of Australia. In dismissing all claims against The North Agency, including finding that The North Agency had not infringed The Agency’s trade marks, the...

read more