A call out to all Directors – When is a resignation really a resignation?

Significant changes regarding resignations of company directors come into effect today.

Last year, amendments to the Corporations Act were made by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Combatting Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2020 (Cth) (“Act“) to combat the rise of phoenix companies.

The new laws, discussed below, increase the liability of directors and include:

  • changes to key requirements relating to director resignations;
  • the introduction of creditor-defeating dispositions; and
  • new tax liabilities.

Due to a year long transition period for certain amendments, the changes to director resignations come into effect from today.

When is a resignation a resignation?

Previously, ASIC would allow resignations of company directors to be backdated. Now, if ASIC is notified of a director’s resignation more than 28 days after it occurs, the effective date of resignation will be the date ASIC receives notice of the resignation.

If you resign as a director, you should make sure that the company notifies ASIC immediately, otherwise you could end up being liable for conduct that occurs after you left the company.

Don’t be left as the last one standing

Directors are also no longer allowed to resign if they are the last remaining director of the company. Except for certain extenuating circumstances, lodgements to cease the last appointed director will be rejected by ASIC, unless a replacement director is also appointed.

How do these changes relate to phoenixing?

Illegal phoenixing occurs where a new company is created to continue the business of an existing company, which has been liquidated to avoid paying outstanding debts, including taxes. The directors of the existing company transfer its assets to a new company at less than market value. Once this has occurred, the existing company is liquidated, leaving no assets to sell to pay off creditors.

The changes coming into effect today impose increased liability on directors and ensure that phoenixing activity cannot be circumvented by simply resigning from the company.

What are the other changes?

Aside from the changes to director resignations, the Act:

  • creates the concept of a “creditor-defeating disposition” which is a disposal of company property for less than market value, which has the effect of preventing, hindering or significantly delaying the property becoming available to meet the demands of the company’s creditors in winding-up;
  • creates a new criminal offence for an officer of a company to engage in or encourage conduct that results in a creditor-defeating disposal when:
    • the company is insolvent or becomes insolvent as a result of the disposal; or
    • the company goes into external administration or ceases to trade less than 12 months after the disposal;

Individuals can face a $495,000.00 fine and 10 years imprisonment, whereas a company could be hit with a fine of $4,950,000.00 or 10% of its annual turnover.

  • gives new powers of recovery to ASIC: When a creditor-defeating disposal has been made, ASIC now has powers to direct a person or company to transfer the property back to the company who originally held the asset, or an amount that “fairly represents” the benefit that the person or company has received;
  • makes tax amendments which reduce a company’s ability to avoid paying taxes by:
    • increasing a director’s personal liability for GST if the company does not pay; and
    • withholding tax refunds where there are outstanding tax lodgements.

If you would like more information on this article, or you would like advice on your rights and obligations as a director, please contact Chris Kintis on 02 8235 1251.

Partner

Chris Kintis leads ClarkeKann's litigation and dispute resolution practice. He is a skilled dispute strategist, commercial and litigation lawyer known for his commercial acumen.

This bulletin is produced as general information in summary for clients and subscribers and should not be relied upon as a substitute for detailed legal advice or as a basis for formulating business or other decisions. ClarkeKann asserts copyright over the contents of this document. This bulletin is produced by ClarkeKann. It is intended to provide general information in summary form on legal topics, current at the time of publication. The contents do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular matters. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation. Privacy Policy

Subscribe

…and we’ll email you valuable insights into issues affecting you and your business.

More Insights

Electronic execution in the time of Coronavirus

Electronic execution in the time of Coronavirus

New legislation allows the continuation of electronic execution of company documents There is some welcome news for companies executing documents whilst lockdown persists. The Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 1) Act 2021 (Cth) came into operation on and from...

read more
Stamp duty v land tax under the spotlight in NSW

Stamp duty v land tax under the spotlight in NSW

Annual Property Tax as an Alternative to Stamp Duty in NSW Last year, NSW announced important taxation changes by outlining a proposal to transition from the up-front payment of stamp duty to an annual property tax. The proposal is contained in the NSW State...

read more
Unit Trusts and Land Tax Threshold Exemptions

Unit Trusts and Land Tax Threshold Exemptions

Land tax threshold exemptions available for unit trusts In NSW, a fixed trust is eligible for land tax threshold exemptions if it satisfies the definition of "fixed trust" under the Land Tax Management Act 1956 ( Act), so that the beneficiaries of the trust are...

read more