In 2002, the Australian Government Productivity Commission estimated there were approximately 270,000 people employed through labour hire, which was the
equivalent to about 2.9 per cent of all employed persons.1
Today, labour hire industries continue to employ a few hundred thousand people, equal to about 2 percent of the workforce.2 It
is estimated there are approximately 5,800 labour hire businesses in Australia, generating $18.5 billion in revenue and distributing approximately
$12.7 billion in wages.3
Despite the fact the use of labour hire has remained steady over the past decade, and continues to generate many hundreds of thousands of jobs, the spotlight has been cast upon labour hire firms in the last few years.But has it gone too far?
A labour hire arrangement typically contains three parties. The essential quality of the relationship is the splitting of contractual and control relationships, whereby:
Labour hire has typically been frowned upon due to the placement of casual employees who are often performing work similar to those employed by the host employer on a permanent basis. Unions argue the denial to casual employees of annual leave and personal leave, and any enterprise specific terms and conditions applying to those they work alongside at the host employer, is unfair.
Further, there have been a number of complaints of underpayments by lower skilled and low paid workers by labour hire providers which have led the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) to conduct several investigations and prosecutions in the past five years. The FWO has wide ranging powers to investigate and prosecute labour hire entities and host employers over breaches of the FW Act, including failures to provide employees with minimum entitlements. The FWO has been utilising the ‘accessorial liability’ provisions of the FW Act to add host employers and their managers as accessories in test cases involving labour hire firms.
There have been several instances this year of litigation brought by unions and employees of labour hire firms, which can be seen as attempts to limit the use of labour hire. This included a union seeking orders that the enterprise agreement of a host employer extended to labour hire employees (although in that case it didn’t, the FWC found it could)5, the first test case under Victoria’s equal opportunity laws6, overturning the approval of enterprise agreements on technical breaches of the procedural requirements in the FW Act when making an enterprise agreement7, the highly publicised case where it was found a casual mineworker who worked according to a roster entitled to annual leave as a permanent employee8, the requirement for labour hire providers to investigate allegations against employees who are excluded from site at a clients request9;and the testing of the vulnerable workers laws (a case which is still being heard).
Each of Queensland, Victoria and South Australia have enacted legislation regulating labour hire10 (although South Australia has just announced the repeal of its law). Each of those Acts:
The LHL Act Qld has the broadest definition of ‘labour hire provider’. It includes anyone who supplies a worker to do work. A worker is supplied by the provider to do work for another person if the provider pays the person for that work.15 There are a number of exclusions to the meaning of “worker” in the Labour Hire Regulations 2018 (Qld), including:16
The penalties for non compliance include fines of up to 1034 penalty units ($130,439) or 3 years imprisonment for individuals, up to 3000 penalty units
($378,450) for corporationsand further penalties for holding out to be licenced (up to 200 penalty units)17
The National Employment Standards, Modern Awards and Enterprise Agreements all continue govern labour hire workers. The Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Vulnerable Workers) Act 2017 was enacted in September 2017, introducing s 558B of the FW Act, meaning a holding company may now be held responsible for a breach by one of its subsidiaries. The same applies to a franchisor, in relation to a breach by one of its franchisees, but only if the franchisor has ‘a significant degree of influence or control’ over the franchisee’s affairs. In each case, the franchisor or holding company, or one of their officers, must have known about the contravention, or should reasonably have known it, or could reasonably have expected that a similar contravention would be likely to occur. Liability can be escaped if reasonable steps have been taken, on the part of the holding company or franchisor, to prevent contraventions.
Some organisations, most notably and recently, the BHP Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA), have decided to bring a significant component of their labour hire requirements ‘in house’. In January and May 2018, BHP registered two wholly owned subsidiaries with the reported intention that each would operate as ‘internal labour hire businesses’ to BMA. This step effectively side-steps the labour hire licensing regime, using relevant legislative exceptions relating to companies in a joint venture.
Arising from the above, the following is a non-exhaustive list of issues labour hire firms, and users of labour hire, will need to consider.
There can be little doubt that in recent years, significant regulation has been placed on labour hire providers, and users of labour hire services have been placed under more scrutiny than ever before. Is the scrutiny and regulation warranted, and has it gone too far?
For more information or queries, please contact Murray Procter via email or by phoning 07 3001 9225.
1 Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper, Melbourne, February 2005.
2 Opinion piece by Ai Group Chief Executive, Innes Willox – Time to end unfair attacks on labour hire industry, 6 September 2018, p 1
3 Inquiry into the practices of labour hire industry in Queensland, Report No 25, Finance and Administration Committee (June 2016) (ILH), p 10
4 ILH, p 8
5 National Union of Workers v CHEP Australia Limited  FWC 3797
6 ABO v NMK (Human Rights)  VCAT 909
7 One Key Workforce v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union  FCAFC 77
8 WorkPac v Skene  FCAFC 131
9 Star v WorkPac  FWC 4991
10 Labour Hire Licensing Act 2017 (Qld) (LHL Act QLD), Labour Hire Licensing Act 2018 (Vic) (LHL Act Vic) and Labour Hire Licensing Act 2017 (SA) (LHL Act SA)
11 LHL Act Qld, s 3; LHL Act Vic, s 4; LHL Act SA, s3
12 LHL Act Qld, s 15; LHL Act Vic, s 17; LHL Act SA, s 17
13 LHL Act Qld, ss 10, 11, 12, 15; LHL Act Vic, ss 13, 15, 16; LHL Act SA, ss 11, 12, 13
14 LHL Act Qld, s 31; LHL Act Vic, s 34; LHL Act SA, s 20
15 LHL Act Qld, s 7
16 Labour Hire Regulations 2018 (Qld), s 4
17 LHL Act Qld, s 10
CK Agribusiness Consultant Tim Ferrier was recently listed in Doyle's Guide to the Australian Legal Profession as a Preeminent Leading Agribusiness Lawyer (Queensland) for 2018. To make this list requires feedback from various sources but most importantly our clients. We thank our clients for that valuable input and look forward to assisting in your continued commercial growth. VIEW MORE