Creditor’s statutory demands (“statutory demands”) are often used by creditors as a method of debt recovery – issued to force a debtor company into paying the debt or risk being wound up.
The Courts have cautioned against the use of statutory demands for this purpose, noting that when a debtor company is solvent, the right course is to bring an action for debt, so pursuing a winding up is an abuse of the Court process.
Statutory demands serve a public interest because they tend to discourage or prevent insolvent companies from continuing to trade.
Unsurprisingly, the statutory demand provisions of the Corporations Act 2011 (Cth) (“Act”) are some of the most highly litigated provisions of any legislation in Australia, particularly regarding applications to have them set aside (Sections 459G and 459J).
While we recommend having a lawyer prepare and issues a statutory demand, we understand that commercial realities sometimes prevent a creditor from engaging a lawyer. To that end, here are some of the basic considerations for preparing and serving a statutory demand.
For a statutory demand to be properly made it must:
A statutory demand should be expressed in clear, correct and unambiguous terms. If not, then the creditor may not be able to rely on it to prove insolvency for the purposes of a winding up application.
WHO CAN MAKE THEM?A creditor can serve a statutory demand in relation to a debt that the company owes to them.
SERVICEOnce the statutory demand is prepared, it must be served in accordance with the Act. While we normally recommend personal service on the Director, it is possible to serve a statutory demand by leaving it at or posting it to, the registered office of the company.
TIMINGA company has 21 days from the date of service to either make payment of the demand, or file an application to have the statutory demand set aside.
A creditor should be aware of the circumstances in which a company may make an application to set aside a statutory demand.
Ultimately, any application to set aside a statutory demand must be filed in the Court and served within 21 days after the statutory demand is served. This strict time period forces the company to move quickly to dispute the statutory demand if it claims the debt is not owing or it has a good reason not to pay it.
The application must be supported by an affidavit which outlines the grounds for contesting the statutory demand. A company cannot file any additional
material with fresh grounds for after the 21 day period expires.
The Court can set aside the statutory demand if the Court is satisfied that:
THERE IS A GENUINE DISPUTE ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF, OR AMOUNT, OF THE DEBT.
This means the dispute must be real and not spurious, hypothetical or illusory.
IT HAS AN OFFSETTING CLAIM.A genuine offsetting claim that the company has against the creditor by way of counterclaim, set off or cross demand (even if it does not arise out of the same transaction or circumstances as the debt to which the statutory demand relates).
A DEFECT IN THE STATUTORY DEMAND WILL CAUSE SUSBSTANITAL INJUSTICE unless the statutory demand is set aside.A defect can be an irregularity, a misstatement of an amount, or a misdescription of the debt or a person.
THERE IS SOME OTHER REASON why the demand should be set aside, including for improper purpose or abuse of process, failing to state (in the supporting affidavit) the source or knowledge, or that the deponent is authorised by the creditor to swear the affidavit and failing to verify that the debt is due and payable.The Queensland Supreme Court recently determined in Palmer Petroleum Pty Ltd v BGP Geoexplorer Pty Ltd that the presence of an arbitration clause is not sufficient to form “some other reason”.
If the company fails to make an application within the time period, then it cannot later resist an application for winding up on any of the same grounds that it could have relied on to set aside the statutory demand.
If the company is successful in having that statutory demand set aside, then the Court may order the creditor pay the company’s cost of the application.
Prior to issuing the statutory demand, a creditor should consider:
If the answer to any of those questions is yes, then think twice about issuing a statutory demand and consider other methods of debt recovery.
If you have any queries about the issuing, setting aside or resisting an application to set aside a statutory demand, then contact ClarkeKann for
assistance or guidance.
Property & Projects Partners Paul O'Dea and Steven Cardell were recently listed in Doyle's Guide to the Australian Legal Profession as leading Property Law Lawyers (Queensland) for 2019. To make this list requires feedback from various sources but most importantly our clients. We thank our clients for that valuable input and look forward to assisting in your continued commercial growth. VIEW MORE